
Our Comments
Expectations Demand A Rapture is and in depth
look at what has been commonly referred to as the "rapture" texts of
Scripture. Stevens approaches these scriptures from a
past-fulfillment covenantal (preterist) perspective. What makes this
book different from so many others is that Stevens is proposing that these
texts call for a literal, physical rapture in the first century.
Steven's book is well worth the study of the serious
Bible student who desires to have a full understanding of the catching
away (rapture) that is written about in Scripture and fulfilled in the
1st century.
Book Information
Expectations Demand A Rapture
Edward Stevens
Paperback - 74 pages
$8.50

|
Expectations Demand A First Century Rapture
by Ed Stevens

Forward
By Arthur Melanson
All of eschatology has been at a loss to explain the
silence of the Church following AD 70. This problem is especially acute
for the Preterist believer, since we proclaim the return of Jesus Christ
and the establishment of the Kingdom of God in the first century setting.
But we are talking about a silence of history, not the Scriptures. The
Bible prophetically is anything but silent - it screams aloud!
Ed, after several years of study, has come to a rather startling
conclusion - the literal rapture of the Church! Ed by his own admission
came to this view kicking and screaming, but he came, and we are richer
for it.
Listen to the logic, the scholarship, and the Bible base for this view.
It's the missing piece of the puzzle!
While proofreading the manuscript for this book, I reviewed all of the
Scripture references. To say this was a great blessing would be a
tremendous understatement. The weight of all the verses presented in this
book is evidence in abundance for a literal rapture of the Church prior to
AD 70.
We Preterists, your editor included, have spiritualized these verses
deeming them fulfilled by covenantal change rather than a literal
fulfillment. The covenants did change (praise God), but that did not
answer to the real expectations of first century Christians. They were
looking for something more, and that "something more" is a literal
catching away to be with the Lord forever.
"Then we who remain alive will be caught up together with them in the
clouds to a meeting with the Lord in the air. And so we will always be
with the Lord." (1 Thess. 4:17)
Let me ask you - if you had received teaching such as this from Jesus,
Paul, John, James, Peter and Jude, what would you expect was going to
happen at the return of Jesus Christ? Literal fulfillment? Well, we think
so too. Trying to rationalize away the clear language of supernatural
events from God has led to false doctrines in preterism - doctrines
without Scriptural support.
The literal rapture view in the first century has the power to get us back
on the Biblical track, and not just we Preterists, but all of Christianity
will be benefactors.
Clearly, Jesus taught his followers they would escape the wrath ready to
be poured out on the ungodly. "Then be watchful at every time, begging
that you be counted worthy to escape all these things, the things being
about to happen, and to stand before the Son of Man." (Lk. 21:36)
Paul taught the same: "...because God has not appointed us to wrath, but
for obtaining salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ. ...and to await His
Son from Heaven, whom He raised from the dead, Jesus, the One delivering
us from the coming wrath." (1 Thess. 5:9-10)
John also tells of Christ's return to receive to Himself those belonging
to Him. "And if I go and prepare a place for you, I am coming again and
will receive you to Myself, that where I am you may be also." (John 14:3)
That place is heaven.
We really should ask ourselves the question Paul asked King Agrippa: "Why
should it be thought incredible by you that God raises the dead?" And if
God can raise the dead, why should we think it incredible that God
translates the living?
This vital piece of the eschatology puzzle needs a full review by you!
Read with your Bible open! You will get the full picture as you read this
volume. Ed not only presents a convincing case for the first century
rapture, but he also answers objections from critics of this view. |